Killing Lincoln
The Shocking Assassination That Changed America Forever
Details
- Description
- Full Record
- Author Notes
- Contents
- Excerpts
- Reviews
- Summary
- A\\V Summary
Searching for more content…
A riveting historical narrative of the heart-stopping events surrounding the assassination of Abraham Lincoln.
Authors:
O'Reilly, Bill
Statement of Responsibility:
Bill O'Reilly & Martin Dugard
Title:
Killing Lincoln
the shocking assassination that changed America forever
[sound recording (CD)]
the shocking assassination that changed America forever
[sound recording (CD)]
Publisher:
[New York] :, Macmillan Audio,, p2011.
Characteristics:
6 sound discs (8 hr.) :,digital ;,4 3/4 in.
Playtime:
080000
▾More
MARC Display»
Community Activity
Find it at DPPL
Loading...

Comment
Add a CommentFACT OR FICTION, YOU DECIDE. I'M SURE SOME OF IT WAS TRUE I WATCH BILL O'RIELLY A LOT, BUT THIS CD AUDIO WAS A STRETCH. TOO MUCH BLOOD AND GORE, WHICH COULD BE TRUE. CIVIL WAR WAS AN AWFUL INJUSTICE TO HUMANITY. THERE IS NO WAY THAT ANYONE RECORDED ALL THE DETAIL IN THIS WAY TOO LONG C D AUDIO. I DID NOT LISTEN TO MORE THAN 3 DISC'S. HOW KILLING LINCOLN REMAINED ON BEST SELLER LIST SO LONG IS BEYOND ME. I WAITED A LONG TIME FOR THIS AUDIO AND WAS VERY DISSAPOINTED.
Audiobook CD was okay – but not one of my favorites. B- CD
I quit this in disgust after one disc due to O'Reilly's wretched narration. There are two main problems. First, it is written and read in the style of a "thriller" as O'Reilly warns in the prologue. That's okay, as I can accept that history should be made interesting, but it tends to undercut faith in the rigor and accuracy of the facts. Worse is the fact that O'Reilly is an idiot. He constantly says Calvary when he means cavalry. It isn't one or two mispronunciations, it is so frequent it is indicative that he simply doesn't know the difference between the two. This totally destroys any confidence that he knows what he's talking about. If he were just the reader I might still believe he was merely illiterate, but he is the co-author so I cannot have any faith in the book itself. The only reason I gave it the second star is that the substance of the book is actually quite interesting, if only I could believe it was true. I understand he is a political commentator of some kind, although I've never heard him so I don't know what his politics are. He claims to have taught history but that's hard to believe. What I do know is that he is a moron and (apparently not much of a Christian, either, since he doesn't know what Calvary means).